#10
NET of 133 · 4.455
16–4
Big East 8-0
SURGING
2026 rank (#10 of 133) improved by 31.1% from 3yr weighted baseline (#15). Moved 4 spots.
RPI
0.635 #14
Strength of Schedule
0.583 #30
Adj. Offense (AOE)
1.958 #13
Adj. Defense (ADE)
-2.497 #8
Best win: W 16–8 at #12 Florida (5/08)
Worst loss: L 6–12 at #7 Michigan (3/26)
NET by season
2023
4.572 #10
2024
4.224 #14
2025
3.264 #18
2026
4.455 #10
Team stats
| Metric | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Strength of Schedule | 0.583 30 | |
| RPI | 0.635 14 | |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 1.958 13 | -2.497 8 |
| Net Efficiency | 4.455 10 | |
| Goals per Possession | 0.306 23 | 0.196 1 |
| Possessions per Game | 45.7 19 | 35.2 17 |
| On-Goal Rate | 68.3 96 | 65.0 13 |
| Goals per Game | 14.0 17 | 6.9 1 |
| Assist Rate | 49.3 63 | 64.5 130 |
| Free-Position % | 56.3 6 | 28.7 2 |
| Unforced TO Rate | 14.6 73 | 18.5 10 |
Small numbers are ranks among 133 DI women's teams; green = near the top, red = near the bottom.
Games
| Date | Opponent | Result | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2/12 | at #51 Southern California | W, 15–4 | 1-0 |
| 2/15 | at #38 Arizona St. | W, 14–7 | 2-0 |
| 2/19 | vs #58 Towson | W, 15–11 | 3-0 |
| 2/22 | at #46 Vanderbilt | W, 17–9 | 4-0 |
| 3/01 | vs #59 High Point | W, 18–6 | 5-0 |
| 3/06 | at #5 Stony Brook | L, 11–12 | 5-1 |
| 3/08 | at #35 Fairfield | W, 15–9 | 6-1 |
| 3/13 | vs #107 Stetson | W, 21–4 | 7-1 |
| 3/22 | vs #54 UConn | W, 15–4 | 8-1 |
| 3/26 | at #7 Michigan | L, 6–12 | 8-2 |
| 3/28 | at #120 Butler | W, 14–2 | 9-2 |
| 4/01 | vs #44 Marquette | W, 15–9 | 10-2 |
| 4/11 | at #40 Villanova | W, 14–5 | 11-2 |
| 4/15 | vs #4 Colorado | L, 6–9 | 11-3 |
| 4/18 | vs #106 Xavier | W, 19–1 | 12-3 |
| 4/25 | at #29 Georgetown | W, 11–5 | 13-3 |
| 4/30 | vs #44 Marquette | W, 17–6 | 14-3 |
| 5/02 | vs #29 Georgetown | W, 12–4 | 15-3 |
| 5/08 | at #12 Florida | W, 16–8 | 16-3 |
| 5/10 | at #4 Colorado | L, 9–11 | 16-4 |
Opponent numbers are their NET rank this season.
Players
| Player | Goals | Assists | Points | Draw Controls | Net Turnovers | LFN Rating | Adj. LFN Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivia Ripple | 3.65 11 | 0.75 326 | 4.40 32 | 3.20 123 | 1.470 19 | 3.560 10 | |
| Eva Thomsen-Marr | 2.20 135 | 1.65 69 | 3.85 68 | 0.25 940 | 0.960 116 | 3.049 44 | |
| Caroline Keil | 3.05 29 | 0.80 303 | 3.85 68 | 0.05 1707 | 0.889 156 | 2.979 63 | |
| Ryan Dineen | 1.45 374 | 1.45 101 | 2.90 189 | 0.05 1707 | 0.696 323 | 2.786 112 | |
| Megan Klingenberg | 0.15 1207 | 0.15 1824 | 0.15 1149 | 1.50 32 | 0.498 567 | 2.588 199 | |
| Carly Frohnapfel | 0.05 1884 | 0.05 2049 | 2.05 246 | 1.10 78 | 0.498 568 | 2.587 200 | |
| Karleigh Mutch | 1.15 533 | 0.65 393 | 1.80 502 | 0.90 491 | 0.419 701 | 2.509 248 | |
| Caroline Bowers | 1.30 450 | 0.60 429 | 1.90 464 | 0.393 753 | 2.483 272 | ||
| Landry Grover | 0.95 471 | 0.80 159 | 0.346 875 | 2.435 297 | |||
| Megan Morneau | 1.00 90 | 0.288 1064 | 2.377 341 | ||||
| Alex Dorr | 2.95 146 | 0.230 1280 | 2.319 392 | ||||
| Kendra Harris | 0.41 1239 | 0.47 562 | 0.88 987 | 0.203 1387 | 2.293 419 | ||
| Ava Welty | 0.20 1018 | 0.55 280 | 0.202 1397 | 2.292 422 | |||
| Lindsey Wilmot | 0.05 1884 | 0.15 1207 | 0.20 1725 | 0.90 491 | 0.157 1661 | 2.247 484 | |
| Rowan Lawrence | 0.50 511 | 0.50 1310 | 0.152 1697 | 2.241 490 | |||
| Kiri Weber | 0.11 1294 | 0.44 387 | 0.130 1883 | 2.220 518 | |||
| Dakota Riggio | 0.50 1086 | 0.17 1146 | 0.67 1157 | 0.111 2040 | 2.200 559 | ||
| Maxine Yeakel | 0.33 495 | 0.091 2194 | 2.180 595 | ||||
| Lindy Briggs | 0.25 1477 | 0.25 1665 | 0.076 2342 | 2.166 616 | |||
| Chelsea Cho | 0.20 1567 | 0.20 1725 | 0.060 2494 | 2.150 640 | |||
| Kyra Obert | 0.25 1477 | 0.06 1506 | 0.31 1613 | 0.06 1524 | 0.059 2516 | 2.149 642 | |
| Maggie Myers | 0.18 759 | 0.053 2570 | 2.143 655 | ||||
| Stella Lynch | 0.17 773 | 0.045 2627 | 2.135 672 | ||||
| Carys Volley | 0.12 1725 | 0.12 1304 | 0.24 1704 | 0.18 1071 | 0.037 2733 | 2.127 685 | |
| Lauren Hall | 0.25 940 | 0.021 2900 | 2.110 719 | ||||
| Maggie Gately | 0.10 1345 | 0.008 2999 | 2.098 738 |
Per-game numbers; small numbers are ranks among all DI women's players. LFN Rating weighs points, draw controls, caused turnovers and turnovers; Adj. LFN Rating adds team strength.
Instagram: @LaxForNerds