#3
NET of 279 · 7.560
16–4
NESCAC 9-3
ELITE
2024 rank (#3 of 279) places them in the top 15% of DIII.
RPI
0.714 #4
Strength of Schedule
0.699 #4
Adj. Offense (AOE)
4.802 #1
Adj. Defense (ADE)
-2.758 #19
Best win: W 18–16 vs #5 Wash. & Lee (3/03)
Worst loss: L 15–17 at #10 Wesleyan (CT) (4/06)
NET by season
2022
8.079 #3
2023
5.021 #19
2024
7.560 #3
Team stats
| Metric | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Strength of Schedule | 0.699 4 | |
| RPI | 0.714 4 | |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 4.802 1 | -2.758 19 |
| Net Efficiency | 7.560 3 | |
| Goals per Possession | 0.356 4 | 0.273 183 |
| Possessions per Game | 49.0 92 | 33.7 12 |
| On-Goal Rate | 76.6 93 | 74.0 96 |
| Goals per Game | 17.4 6 | 9.2 50 |
| Assist Rate | 48.7 76 | 34.2 16 |
| Free-Position % | 49.6 57 | 47.3 191 |
| Unforced TO Rate | 12.2 13 | 20.0 123 |
Small numbers are ranks among 279 DIII women's teams; green = near the top, red = near the bottom.
Games
| Date | Opponent | Result | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3/02 | at #75 Connecticut Col. | W, 17–4 | 1-0 |
| 3/03 | vs #5 Wash. & Lee | W, 18–16 | 2-0 |
| 3/06 | at #17 MIT | W, 21–9 | 3-0 |
| 3/09 | vs #39 Trinity (CT) | W, 20–6 | 4-0 |
| 3/13 | vs #22 Cortland | W, 19–4 | 5-0 |
| 3/16 | at #82 Hamilton | W, 21–9 | 6-0 |
| 3/23 | vs #72 WestConn | W, 22–2 | 7-0 |
| 3/24 | at #47 Endicott | W, 19–8 | 8-0 |
| 3/30 | at #32 Colby | W, 15–6 | 9-0 |
| 4/02 | vs #43 Williams | W, 17–9 | 10-0 |
| 4/06 | at #10 Wesleyan (CT) | L, 15–17 | 10-1 |
| 4/10 | vs #96 Bates | W, 23–5 | 11-1 |
| 4/13 | vs #1 Middlebury | L, 13–14 | 11-2 |
| 4/20 | at #50 Amherst | W, 17–12 | 12-2 |
| 4/24 | at #59 Bowdoin | W, 17–7 | 13-2 |
| 4/27 | vs #39 Trinity (CT) | W, 15–10 | 14-2 |
| 5/04 | at #10 Wesleyan (CT) | L, 7–15 | 14-3 |
| 5/12 | vs #22 Cortland | W, 21–7 | 15-3 |
| 5/18 | at #7 Denison | W, 22–13 | 16-3 |
| 5/19 | at #4 Franklin & Marshall | L, 10–11 | 16-4 |
Opponent numbers are their NET rank this season.
Players
| Player | Goals | Assists | Points | Draw Controls | Net Turnovers | LFN Rating | Adj. LFN Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ella Lesperance | 2.20 426 | 2.40 44 | 4.60 113 | 0.896 375 | 3.162 49 | ||
| Margie Carden | 2.95 195 | 1.20 269 | 4.15 176 | 0.05 2668 | 0.828 437 | 3.094 69 | |
| Madeline Delaney | 1.47 825 | 0.37 1235 | 1.84 996 | 3.47 300 | 0.11 768 | 0.798 479 | 3.064 77 |
| Allie Zorn | 2.25 403 | 1.45 181 | 3.70 280 | 0.05 2668 | 0.718 582 | 2.984 101 | |
| Emma Joyce | 2.00 501 | 0.20 1693 | 2.20 796 | 2.35 562 | 0.683 637 | 2.949 114 | |
| Elsa Schutt | 0.63 1646 | 0.37 1235 | 1.00 1568 | 3.32 334 | 0.554 847 | 2.820 163 | |
| Genna Gibbons | 0.05 2701 | 0.10 2122 | 0.15 2498 | 3.85 233 | 0.35 425 | 0.487 992 | 2.753 200 |
| Kathryn Fernandopulle | 0.15 2355 | 0.15 1911 | 0.30 2280 | 0.10 2117 | 1.75 14 | 0.419 1146 | 2.685 240 |
| Schuyler Lloyd | 1.05 1196 | 0.25 1530 | 1.30 1357 | 1.10 963 | 0.379 1258 | 2.645 277 | |
| Kate Deehan | 0.85 1370 | 0.85 1726 | 0.55 1288 | 0.10 776 | 0.286 1532 | 2.552 347 | |
| Caroline Conaghan | 0.80 1424 | 0.40 1163 | 1.20 1422 | 0.236 1738 | 2.502 375 | ||
| Emily Leschin | 0.32 2060 | 0.05 2460 | 0.37 2192 | 1.68 761 | 0.229 1769 | 2.495 379 | |
| Kate Mastrobuono | 0.71 1552 | 0.59 810 | 1.29 1361 | 0.228 1777 | 2.494 382 | ||
| Alexa Amorosino | 0.69 1568 | 0.31 1374 | 1.00 1568 | 0.186 1987 | 2.452 421 | ||
| Sophia Claps | 0.38 1973 | 0.38 1199 | 0.77 1807 | 0.180 2017 | 2.446 431 | ||
| Grace Frerichs | 0.45 1894 | 0.45 2119 | 0.55 1291 | 0.150 2196 | 2.416 467 | ||
| Caroline Cromwell | 0.45 1904 | 0.10 2122 | 0.55 2024 | 0.15 1893 | 0.148 2203 | 2.414 470 | |
| Nicola Donlan | 0.17 1824 | 0.17 2459 | 0.39 392 | 0.109 2470 | 2.375 517 | ||
| Lucy Hodge | 0.38 1973 | 0.23 1619 | 0.62 1951 | 0.094 2599 | 2.360 546 | ||
| Kate Wujciak | 0.08 2491 | 0.08 2610 | 0.08 2200 | 0.25 541 | 0.091 2630 | 2.357 552 | |
| Nicola Sommers | 0.05 2631 | 0.21 613 | 0.055 2968 | 2.321 596 | |||
| Annie Aspesi | 0.18 1781 | 0.024 3283 | 2.290 653 | ||||
| Meg Hatton | 0.06 847 | 0.012 3419 | 2.278 677 |
Per-game numbers; small numbers are ranks among all DIII women's players. LFN Rating weighs points, draw controls, caused turnovers and turnovers; Adj. LFN Rating adds team strength.
Instagram: @LaxForNerds