California WLAX

ACC · DI Women · 2026
Season 20222023202420252026
#88 NET of 133 · -1.313
6–11 ACC 1-9
STEADY 2026 rank (#88 of 133) declined by 7.6% from 3yr weighted baseline (#82). Moved 6 spots.
RPI
0.489 #76
Strength of Schedule
0.517 #63
Adj. Offense (AOE)
-0.649 #90
Adj. Defense (ADE)
0.664 #89
Best win: W 17–10 vs #76 Stonehill (3/09) Worst loss: L 12–13 vs #67 UC Davis (2/23)
NET by season
2023
-2.204 #95 2024
-0.739 #78 2025
-1.090 #76 2026
-1.313 #88

Team stats

Metric Offense Defense
Strength of Schedule 0.517 63
RPI 0.489 76
Adjusted Efficiency -0.649 90 0.664 89
Net Efficiency -1.313 88
Goals per Possession 0.258 85 0.282 91
Possessions per Game 34.6 125 47.1 110
On-Goal Rate 74.7 15 72.6 92
Goals per Game 8.9 112 13.3 105
Assist Rate 50.0 56 43.8 38
Free-Position % 38.5 109 45.9 71
Unforced TO Rate 15.4 89 11.2 117

Small numbers are ranks among 133 DI women's teams; green = near the top, red = near the bottom.

Games

DateOpponentResultRecord
2/06 at #98 San Diego St. W, 13–12 1-0
2/08 at #51 Southern California L, 9–16 1-1
2/13 vs #93 Florida St. W, 10–9 2-1
2/19 at #83 Oregon W, 14–9 3-1
2/23 vs #67 UC Davis L, 12–13 3-2
2/28 at #28 Duke L, 7–16 3-3
3/03 at #14 Syracuse L, 3–13 3-4
3/07 vs #16 Boston College L, 8–15 3-5
3/09 vs #76 Stonehill W, 17–10 4-5
3/12 vs #1 North Carolina L, 3–20 4-6
3/16 vs #99 Marist W, 18–10 5-6
3/21 at #57 Louisville L, 5–12 5-7
3/24 at #106 Xavier W, 11–10 6-7
3/28 at #20 Notre Dame L, 4–17 6-8
4/03 vs #9 Clemson L, 8–17 6-9
4/11 vs #47 Virginia Tech L, 5–10 6-10
4/16 at #6 Stanford L, 5–17 6-11

Opponent numbers are their NET rank this season.

Players

Player Goals Assists Points Draw Controls Net Turnovers LFN Rating Adj. LFN Rating
Courtney Wong 1.53 341 0.94 251 2.47 295 4.06 82 0.846 186 2.100 736
Emily Moes 1.54 332 0.77 318 2.31 331 0.467 613 1.721 1450
Avery Hoeft 0.53 1073 1.47 94 2.00 418 0.06 1582 0.369 810 1.623 1682
Ashleigh Masterson 0.65 927 0.12 1304 0.76 1071 2.82 164 0.368 816 1.621 1684
Kennedy Herndon 0.88 138 0.256 1172 1.510 1976
Katie Bloomer 0.65 927 0.65 1189 0.06 981 0.249 1195 1.503 1989
Josie Lillquist 1.06 590 0.31 802 1.38 679 0.228 1288 1.482 2057
Alina Hsu 0.69 889 0.25 909 0.94 945 0.06 1524 0.226 1296 1.480 2059
Clara Page 0.06 1834 0.06 1978 0.24 973 0.47 358 0.208 1370 1.461 2103
Ari Tavoso 1.35 362 0.24 652 0.202 1399 1.456 2119
Juliana Doran 0.31 1412 0.08 1447 0.38 1503 1.08 422 0.163 1623 1.417 2200
Audrey Crafts 0.58 637 0.25 649 0.153 1684 1.407 2218
Willow Cyr 0.50 1086 0.12 1264 0.62 1204 0.143 1769 1.397 2240
Grace Kerr 1.12 412 0.134 1855 1.388 2263
Katie McMullen 0.53 1073 0.06 1552 0.59 1237 0.18 1071 0.133 1860 1.387 2266
Meaghan Lynch 0.43 1208 0.43 1449 0.130 1886 1.384 2272
Dahlen Vilbrandt 0.22 1543 0.11 1336 0.33 1542 0.11 1294 0.120 1976 1.374 2292
Maddie Willkomm 0.64 939 0.14 1216 0.79 1062 0.107 2054 1.361 2315
Ardyn Henry 0.40 1254 0.10 1375 0.50 1310 0.10 1345 0.068 2408 1.322 2373
Annette Ciupek 0.35 816 0.055 2545 1.309 2389
Katie Knowlton 0.14 1156 0.14 815 0.051 2589 1.305 2398

Per-game numbers; small numbers are ranks among all DI women's players. LFN Rating weighs points, draw controls, caused turnovers and turnovers; Adj. LFN Rating adds team strength.

Instagram: @LaxForNerds