#26
NET of 133 · 2.635
11–9
Big Ten 4-6
SURGING
2026 rank (#26 of 133) improved by 33.2% from 3yr weighted baseline (#39). Moved 13 spots.
RPI
0.625 #16
Strength of Schedule
0.672 #6
Adj. Offense (AOE)
1.676 #16
Adj. Defense (ADE)
-0.959 #36
Best win: W 13–12 vs #7 Michigan (4/09)
Worst loss: L 9–15 at #21 Princeton (2/25)
NET by season
2023
1.301 #37
2024
1.842 #32
2025
1.099 #46
2026
2.635 #26
Team stats
| Metric | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Strength of Schedule | 0.672 6 | |
| RPI | 0.625 16 | |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 1.676 16 | -0.959 36 |
| Net Efficiency | 2.635 26 | |
| Goals per Possession | 0.289 36 | 0.271 74 |
| Possessions per Game | 44.5 28 | 43.6 86 |
| On-Goal Rate | 68.3 96 | 68.3 46 |
| Goals per Game | 12.8 27 | 11.8 77 |
| Assist Rate | 63.4 3 | 44.7 42 |
| Free-Position % | 38.2 110 | 43.9 54 |
| Unforced TO Rate | 12.7 44 | 11.5 116 |
Small numbers are ranks among 133 DI women's teams; green = near the top, red = near the bottom.
Games
| Date | Opponent | Result | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2/06 | vs #15 Army West Point | L, 14–19 | 0-1 |
| 2/13 | at #30 Delaware | W, 12–4 | 1-1 |
| 2/18 | vs #87 Monmouth | W, 20–5 | 2-1 |
| 2/21 | at #40 Villanova | W, 15–12 | 3-1 |
| 2/25 | at #21 Princeton | L, 9–15 | 3-2 |
| 2/28 | vs #48 Hofstra | W, 17–7 | 4-2 |
| 3/07 | at #42 Temple | W, 17–16 | 5-2 |
| 3/11 | at #5 Stony Brook | L, 8–11 | 5-3 |
| 3/15 | vs #8 Johns Hopkins | L, 12–15 | 5-4 |
| 3/19 | at #32 Ohio St. | W, 9–8 | 6-4 |
| 3/28 | at #51 Southern California | W, 15–8 | 7-4 |
| 3/30 | at #98 San Diego St. | W, 14–8 | 8-4 |
| 4/04 | at #11 Maryland | L, 11–18 | 8-5 |
| 4/09 | vs #7 Michigan | W, 13–12 | 9-5 |
| 4/12 | vs #83 Oregon | W, 21–7 | 10-5 |
| 4/15 | at #2 Northwestern | L, 6–18 | 10-6 |
| 4/18 | vs #13 Penn St. | L, 15–18 | 10-7 |
| 4/22 | at #8 Johns Hopkins | L, 9–14 | 10-8 |
| 5/08 | at #21 Princeton | W, 12–11 | 11-8 |
| 5/10 | at #11 Maryland | L, 8–11 | 11-9 |
Opponent numbers are their NET rank this season.
Players
| Player | Goals | Assists | Points | Draw Controls | Net Turnovers | LFN Rating | Adj. LFN Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Ling | 3.15 24 | 1.70 65 | 4.85 19 | 0.15 1149 | 1.205 46 | 3.031 49 | |
| Katie Buck | 0.05 1641 | 0.05 2049 | 8.30 17 | 0.45 380 | 0.908 147 | 2.734 129 | |
| Lily Dixon | 0.68 895 | 2.63 17 | 3.32 125 | 0.11 1327 | 0.902 151 | 2.728 132 | |
| Kate Theofield | 2.25 126 | 0.95 246 | 3.20 141 | 0.10 1345 | 0.764 250 | 2.590 195 | |
| Hilary Elsner | 1.80 239 | 0.40 644 | 2.20 365 | 1.05 439 | 0.612 414 | 2.438 294 | |
| Delainey Sutley | 1.40 398 | 0.55 473 | 1.95 442 | 0.10 1345 | 0.472 607 | 2.298 414 | |
| Payton Tini | 0.95 673 | 0.50 511 | 1.45 642 | 0.40 778 | 0.418 704 | 2.244 488 | |
| Annalise Messina | 0.70 885 | 0.25 909 | 0.95 936 | 1.45 348 | 0.394 751 | 2.220 519 | |
| Charlee Thomas | 2.40 200 | 0.35 482 | 0.316 952 | 2.142 658 | |||
| Alex Popham | 0.90 717 | 0.10 1375 | 1.00 858 | 0.294 1031 | 2.120 701 | ||
| Bianca Chiarella | 0.10 1345 | 0.90 137 | 0.289 1057 | 2.115 716 | |||
| Kimberly Greenblatt | 0.29 903 | 0.71 192 | 0.231 1272 | 2.057 814 | |||
| Gabby Mariani | 0.15 1673 | 0.25 909 | 0.40 1478 | 0.05 1707 | 0.20 721 | 0.229 1284 | 2.055 817 |
| Maddie Miceli | 0.15 1149 | 0.60 254 | 0.225 1302 | 2.051 823 | |||
| Ava Chiarella | 0.60 980 | 0.27 888 | 0.87 1005 | 0.189 1461 | 2.015 895 | ||
| Samantha Swanovich | 0.50 1086 | 0.20 1031 | 0.70 1140 | 0.20 1018 | 0.174 1554 | 2.000 921 | |
| Francesca Urtis | 0.25 1477 | 0.50 511 | 0.75 1079 | 0.159 1645 | 1.985 946 | ||
| Gianna Macrino | 0.12 1707 | 0.25 909 | 0.38 1506 | 0.125 1927 | 1.951 1019 | ||
| Nora Maione | 0.42 404 | 0.119 1983 | 1.945 1029 | ||||
| Abigail Grove | 0.09 1771 | 0.09 1400 | 0.18 1768 | 0.09 1370 | 0.18 744 | 0.112 2031 | 1.938 1041 |
| Stella D'Ambro | 0.20 1567 | 0.20 1031 | 0.40 1478 | 0.40 778 | 0.062 2467 | 1.888 1138 | |
| Kayleigh Coughlin | 0.29 1426 | 0.18 1110 | 0.47 1398 | 0.056 2535 | 1.882 1151 | ||
| Gianna Eglauf | 0.044 2655 | 1.870 1188 | |||||
| Simone Koryszewski | 0.022 2877 | 1.848 1231 |
Per-game numbers; small numbers are ranks among all DI women's players. LFN Rating weighs points, draw controls, caused turnovers and turnovers; Adj. LFN Rating adds team strength.
Instagram: @LaxForNerds
